Qt Thread Slot Signal
- Qt provides thread support in the form of platform-independent threading classes, a thread-safe way of posting events, and signal-slot connections across threads. This makes it easy to develop portable multithreaded Qt applications and take advantage of multiprocessor machines. Home Articles Programming C/C.
- Lets explain it more, Each thread created by Qt (including main thread and new threads created by QThread) have Event loop, the event loop is responsible for receiving signals and call aproporiate slots in its thread.
Signals and slots were one of the distinguishing features that made Qt an exciting and innovative tool back in time. But sometimes you can teach new tricks to an old dog, and QObjects gained a new way to connect between signals and slots in Qt5, plus some extra features to connect to other functions which are not slots. Let’s review how to get the most of that feature. This assumes you are already moderately familiar with signals and slots.
One simple thought about the basics
Free Spins: Available after deposit bonus is redeemed/lost, credited as Qt Signals And Slots Thread Safe £2 bonus. MONOPOLY Live only. 1x wagering and Max bonus bet of £5 applies to winnings, 7 days to accept & Qt Signals And Slots Thread Safe 7 days to complete wagering, maximum withdrawal from winnings is £200.
I am not going to bore you with repeating basic knowledge you already have, but I want you to look at signals and slots from a certain angle, so it will be easier to understand the design of the feature I will cover next. What’s the purpose of signals and slots? It’s a way in which “one object” makes sure that when “something happened”, then “other object” “reacts to something happened”. As simple as that. That can be expressed in pseudocode like this:
Notice that the four phrases that are into quotes in the previous paragraph are the four arguments of the function call in the pseudocode. Notice also that one typical way to write the connect statement is aligning the arguments like this, because then the first column (first and third arguments) are object instances that answer “where?” and the second column (second and fourth arguments) are functions that answer “what?”.
In C++ instead of pseudocode, and using real life objects and classes, this would look like this in Qt4 or earlier:
That could be a typical statement from a “Hello World” tutorial, where a button is created and shown, and when it’s pressed the whole window closes and the application terminates.
Now to the main point that I want you to notice here. This has a very subtle advantage over a typical mechanism used in standard C or C++ 11 like callbacks with function pointers and lambda functions wrapped in std::function, and is subtle only because is so nice we often forget about it when we have used signals and slots for a while. If the sender object is destroyed, it obviously can not emit any signal because it is a member function of its class. But for the sender to call the receiver, it needs a pointer to it, and you as a user, don’t need to worry at all about the receiver being destroyed and becoming invalid (that is done automatically by the library), so you very rarely need to call QObject::disconnect.
So signals and slots are very safe by default, and in an automatic way.
The new versus the old way to use connect
The previous example shows one way that works across old versions of Qt published so far (Qt 1 to 5). Recently a blog post about porting a tutorial application from Qt 1 to Qt 5.11 has been published, and no porting was needed at all for signals, slots, or the connections! That doesn’t mean the feature is perfect, since a new way to make connections was added, keeping all the previous functionality.
The main problem with the example above is that (as you probably knew, or guessed from being all uppercase) is that SIGNAL and SLOT are macros, and what those macros do is convert to a string the argument passed. This is a problem because any typo in what gets passed to those means that the call to connect would fail and return false. So since Qt 5.0, a new overload to QObject::connect exists, and supports passing as second and fourth arguments a function pointer to specify which member function should be called. Ported to the new syntax, the above example is:
Now any typo in the name will produce a compile time error. If you misspelled “click” with “clik” in the first example, that would only fail printing a warning in the console when that function gets called. If you did that in some dialog of an application you would have to navigate to that dialog to confirm that it worked! And it would be even more annoying if you were connecting to some error handling, and is not that easy to trigger said error. But if you did the same typo in the last example, it would be a compile time error, which is clearly much better.
This example is usually said to be using the “new syntax”, and the previous example the “old syntax”. Just remember that the old is still valid, but the new is preferred in most situations.
Since this is an exciting new feature added to a new major version, which has received some extra polishing during the minor releases, many blog posts from other members of the Qt community have been published about it (for example covering implementation details or the issues that could arise when there are arguments involved). I won’t cover those topics again, and instead I will focus on the details that in my experience would be most beneficial for people to read on.
No need to declare members as slots anymore (or almost)
The new syntax allows to call not just a member function declared as slot in the header with public slots: (or with protected or private instead of public), but any kind of function (more on that in the next section). There is still one use case where you would want to declare functions as slots, and that is if you want to make that function usable by any feature that happens at run time. That could be QML, for example.
Connecting to anything callable
Now we can connect to any “callable”, which could be a free standing function, a lambda function or a member function of an object that doesn’t derive from QObject. That looks in code like the following:
But wait, where is that nice symmetry with 2 rows and two columns now?
When you connect to a lambda, there is a receiver object, the lambda itself, but there is no signature to specify since it’s the function call operator (the same would happen to a function object or “functor”, by the way). And when there is a free standing function there is a signature, but there is no instance, so the third and the fourth arguments of the first two calls are somewhat merged. Note that the arguments are still checked at compile time: the signal has no arguments, and the lambda has no arguments either. Both sender and receiver are in agreement.
The example using std::bind requires a bit more explanation if you are not familiar with it. In this case we have the two objects and the two function pointers, which is to be expected for what is wanted. We don’t often think about it like this, but we always need a pointer to call a member function (unless it is static). When it is not used, it is because this is implicit, and this->call() can be shortened to call(). So what std::bind does here is create a callable object that glues together the particular instance that we want with one member function. We could do the same with a lambda:
Note that std::bind is actually much more powerful, and can be very useful when the number of arguments differ. But we will leave that topic to another article.
One common use of the above pattern with std::bind is when you have a class implemented through a data pointer (private implementation or pimpl idiom). If you need a button or a timer to call a member function of the private class that is not going to be a QObject, you can write something like this:
Recovering symmetry, safety and convenience
With the previous examples that nice balance of the four arguments is gone. But we are missing something more important.
What would happen if the lambda of the previous examples would use an invalid pointer? In the very first C++ example we showed a button wanting to close the application. Imagine that the button required to close a dialog, or stop some network request, etc. If the object is destroyed because said dialog is already closed or the request finished long ago, we want to manage that automatically so we don’t use an invalid pointer.
An example. For some reason you show some widget and you need to do some last minute update after it has been shown. It needs to happen soon but not immediately, so you use a timer with a short timeout. And you write
That works, but has a subtle problem. It could be that the widget gets shown and immediately closed. The timer under the scenes doesn’t know that, and it will happily call you, and crash the application. If you made the timer connect to a slot of the widget, that won’t happen: as soon as the dialog goes away, the connection gets broken.
Since Qt 5.2 we can have the best of both worlds, and recover that nice warm feeling of having a well balanced connect statement with two objects and two functions. 🙂
In that Qt version an additional overload was added to QObject::connect, and now there is the possibility to pass as third argument a so called “context object”, and as fourth argument the same variety of callables shown previously. Then the context object serves the purpose of automatically breaking the connection when the context is destroyed. That warranties the problem mentioned is now gone. You can easily handle that there are no longer invalid captures on a lambda.
The previous example is almost as the previous:
Now it is as if the lambda were a slot in your class, because to the timer, the context of the connection is the same.
The only requirement is that said context object has to be a QObject. This is not usually a problem, since you can create and ad-hoc QObject instance and even do simple but useful tricks with it. For example, say that you want to run a lambda only on the first click:
This will delete the ad-hoc QObject guard on the first invocation, and the connection will be automatically broken. The object also has the button as a parent, so it won’t be leaked if the button is never clicked and goes away (it will be deleted as well). You can use any QObject as context object, but the most common case will be to shut down timers, processes, requests, or anything related to what your user interface is doing when some dialog, window or panel closes.
Tip: There are utility classes in Qt to handle the lifetime of QObjects automatically, like QScopedPointer and QObjectCleanupHandler. If you have some part of the application using Qt classes but no UI tightly related to that, you can surely find a way to leverage those as members of a class not based on QObject. It is often stated as a criticism to Qt, that you can’t put QObjects in containers or smart pointers. Often the alternatives do exist and can be as good, if not better (but admittedly this is a matter of taste).
Bonus point: thread safety by thread affinity
The above section is the main goal of this article. The context object can save you crashes, and having to manually disconnect. But there is one additional important use of it: making the signal be delivered in the thread that you prefer, so you can save from tedious and error prone locking.
Again, there is one killer feature of signals and slots that we often ignore because it happens automatically. When one QObject instance is the receiver of a signal, its thread affinity is checked, and by default the signal is delivered directly as a function call when is the same thread affinity of the sender. But if the thread affinity differs, it will be delivered posting an event to the object. The internals of Qt will convert that event to a function call that will happen in the next run of the event loop of the receiver, so it will be in the “normal” thread for that object, and you often can forget about locks entirely. The locks are inside Qt, because QCoreApplication::postEvent (the function used to add the event to the queue) is thread-safe. In case of need, you can force a direct call from different threads, or a queued call from the same thread. Check the fifth argument in the QObject::connect documentation (it’s an argument which defaults to Qt::AutoConection).
Let’s see it in a very typical example.
This shows a class that derives from QRunnable to reimplement the run() function, and that derives from QObject to provide the finished() signal. An instance is created after the user activates a button, and then we show some progress bar and run the task. But we want to notify the user when the task is done (show some message, hide some progress bar, etc.).
In the above example, the third argument (context object) might be forgotten, and the code will compile and run, but it would be a serious bug. It would mean that you would attempt to call into the UI thread from the thread where the task was run (which is a helper thread pool, not the UI thread). This is wrong, and in some cases Qt will nicely warn you that you are using some function from the wrong thread, but if you are not lucky, you will have a mysterious crash.
Wrap up
Hopefully now you’ve understood why that odd point was made in the introduction section. You don’t have to agree that it is aesthetically pleasing to write the arguments to connect in two rows and two columns, but if you understood the importance of using a context object as a rule of thumb, you probably will find your preferred way to remember if that third argument is needed when you write (or review other’s) code using connect.
This example was ported from the PyQt4 version by Guðjón Guðjónsson.
Introduction
In some applications it is often necessary to perform long-running tasks, such as computations or network operations, that cannot be broken up into smaller pieces and processed alongside normal application events. In such cases, we would like to be able to perform these tasks in a way that does not interfere with the normal running of the application, and ensure that the user interface continues to be updated. One way of achieving this is to perform these tasks in a separate thread to the main user interface thread, and only interact with it when we have results we need to display.
This example shows how to create a separate thread to perform a task - in this case, drawing stars for a picture - while continuing to run the main user interface thread. The worker thread draws each star onto its own individual image, and it passes each image back to the example's window which resides in the main application thread.
The User Interface
We begin by importing the modules we require. We need the math and random modules to help us draw stars.
The main window in this example is just a QWidget. We create a single Worker instance that we can reuse as required.
Qt Thread Signal Slot
The user interface consists of a label, spin box and a push button that the user interacts with to configure the number of stars that the thread wil draw. The output from the thread is presented in a QLabel instance, viewer.
We connect the standard finished() and terminated() signals from the thread to the same slot in the widget. This will reset the user interface when the thread stops running. The custom output(QRect, QImage) signal is connected to the addImage() slot so that we can update the viewer label every time a new star is drawn.
The start button's clicked() signal is connected to the makePicture() slot, which is responsible for starting the worker thread.
We place each of the widgets into a grid layout and set the window's title:
The makePicture() slot needs to do three things: disable the user interface widgets that are used to start a thread, clear the viewer label with a new pixmap, and start the thread with the appropriate parameters.
Since the start button is the only widget that can cause this slot to be invoked, we simply disable it before starting the thread, avoiding problems with re-entrancy.
We call a custom method in the Worker thread instance with the size of the viewer label and the number of stars, obtained from the spin box.
Whenever is star is drawn by the worker thread, it will emit a signal that is connected to the addImage() slot. This slot is called with a QRect value, indicating where the star should be placed in the pixmap held by the viewer label, and an image of the star itself:
We use a QPainter to draw the image at the appropriate place on the label's pixmap.
The updateUi() slot is called when a thread stops running. Since we usually want to let the user run the thread again, we reset the user interface to enable the start button to be pressed:
Now that we have seen how an instance of the Window class uses the worker thread, let us take a look at the thread's implementation.
The Worker Thread
The worker thread is implemented as a PyQt thread rather than a Python thread since we want to take advantage of the signals and slots mechanism to communicate with the main application.
We define size and stars attributes that store information about the work the thread is required to do, and we assign default values to them. The exiting attribute is used to tell the thread to stop processing.
Each star is drawn using a QPainterPath that we define in advance:
Before a Worker object is destroyed, we need to ensure that it stops processing. For this reason, we implement the following method in a way that indicates to the part of the object that performs the processing that it must stop, and waits until it does so.
For convenience, we define a method to set up the attributes required by the thread before starting it.
The start() method is a special method that sets up the thread and calls our implementation of the run() method. We provide the render() method instead of letting our own run() method take extra arguments because the run() method is called by PyQt itself with no arguments.
The run() method is where we perform the processing that occurs in the thread provided by the Worker instance:
Information stored as attributes in the instance determines the number of stars to be drawn and the area over which they will be distributed.
Qt Signal Emit
We draw the number of stars requested as long as the exiting attribute remains False. This additional check allows us to terminate the thread on demand by setting the exiting attribute to True at any time.
The drawing code is not particularly relevant to this example. We simply draw on an appropriately-sized transparent image.
For each star drawn, we send the main thread information about where it should be placed along with the star's image by emitting our custom output() signal:
Qt Event Vs Signal
Since QRect and QImage objects can be serialized for transmission via the signals and slots mechanism, they can be sent between threads in this way, making it convenient to use threads in a wide range of situations where built-in types are used.
Running the Example
Qthread Emit
We only need one more piece of code to complete the example: